NFLX: A MULTI-METHODOLOGICAL ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE INVESTMENT VIABILITY AND THE OPTIMAL ENTRY PRICE.

 

Netflix is ​​an American technology and entertainment company, primarily recognized as the world leader in subscription video-on-demand (SVOD) streaming services.

From an economic perspective, Netflix operates under a subscription revenue model; its main source of income is the recurring monthly fees paid by users. This provides it with a high degree of revenue visibility and a high-margin business model once economies of scale are achieved.

Its competitive advantage lies in its vast content library, particularly Netflix Original (O-Net) content. Investment in content (working capital and fixed capital, in terms of production) is the driving force behind subscriber acquisition and retention (churn rate). Netflix utilizes advanced recommendation algorithms to improve user experience and reduce churn, operating with a global content delivery network (CDN), which minimizes marginal distribution costs.

The development of Netflix's stock price (NFLX) has been a story of disruptive growth and innovation-driven volatility. Netflix's future will focus on managing the maturing streaming market and shifting its focus from growth at all costs to maximizing free cash flow (FCF).

From a revenue perspective, growth will come from the inclusion of an ad-supported tier, a key economic lever for increasing Average Revenue Per User (ARPU), especially in price-sensitive markets. Restricting and charging for shared accounts directly increases the number of paid subscribers and, consequently, revenue.

In mature, high-spending markets, price remains a key lever. Netflix is ​​expected to be more selective and seek a higher return on investment (ROI) for its content, rather than spending indiscriminately.

Netflix has indicated that Free Cash Flow is now its primary financial metric, signaling a commitment to profitability and shareholder returns (potential share buybacks).

Intense competition necessitates maintaining a high level of investment in content (keeping costs high), and the risk of market saturation hinders subscriber growth in key regions.

Netflix's financial strength has strengthened in recent years. Historically, the company has carried significant debt to finance its massive content spending. However, in recent periods, it has reduced its reliance on external financing.

The net debt-to-EBITDA ratio has been high in the past; the company is focused on debt reduction and has improved its credit rating. Liquidity is generally adequate, supported by strong expected operating cash flow. The focus on positive free cash flow is a key Indicator of the company's ability to self-finance its operations and debt service.

Operating and net margins have tended to improve as the business achieves global scale. Netflix's operating margin is one of the highest in the streaming industry, demonstrating its efficiency.

Netflix is ​​a financially sound company that has transitioned from a high-debt growth profile to a more mature profile focused on profitability and sustainable cash generation.

 

The price chart shows NFLX's historical upward trajectory, from an initial price of 0.76 (adjusted for stock splits) to a final price of 94. An initial phase of low growth is observed, followed by a growth surge (rally) that began around 2012-2013, characterizing NFLX as a disruptive growth stock. The trend is markedly upward.

The linear trend is defined by the equation Y = 0.0236x − 14.79, suggesting steady growth. However, given the low R² (R-squared) value of 0.7360, this linear regression is not the most suitable model for capturing the volatile and exponential nature of NFLX's growth. An R² of 0.7360 indicates that the line only explains 73.60% of the price variability, leaving a significant portion unmodeled.

Such a high correlation coefficient (0.9606) indicates that a sixth-order polynomial model fits the historical price curve extremely accurately, capturing both boom phases and corrections, while the third-order polynomial correlation (89.68%), although very high, does not accurately reflect the true value The third-order polynomial correlation (89.68%), while very good, is lower than that of the sixth-order polynomial. The greater predictive power and fit (correlation being a measure of fit) of the sixth-order polynomial over the third-order polynomial suggests that NFLX's price growth over the years has been nonlinear and highly complex, with multiple inflections that only a higher-order model can replicate. However, the risk of using higher-order models for forecasting is overfitting to past data, which can lead to erroneous predictions outside the range of historical data.

The descriptive statistics table reveals key characteristics: in finance, a leptokurtic or high-kurtosis distribution means that extreme events (both very large gains and losses) are more likely than a normal distribution model (the Gaussian bell curve) would predict. For an investor seeking to reduce risk, it is vital to understand that volatility (standard deviation) underestimates the true risk. Kurtosis indicates a higher tail risk, meaning the probability of experiencing large losses (or large gains) is greater than expected.

For NFLX, this positive kurtosis confirms that investing in the stock has involved a high probability of large fluctuations (both crashes and rallies).

The histogram shows that most price observations are concentrated in the first class interval (0.7–10.7). This is visual evidence of two facts: the price remained low for many years (the DVD era and the beginning of streaming). The distribution is strongly skewed As the positive skew already indicated, the bell curve does not fit well.

Given the skewness and kurtosis, the distribution of NFLX prices differs significantly from a normal distribution. This is typical of volatile growth stocks. In finance, the assumption of normality for prices is rarely met, so kurtosis and skew analysis is fundamental.

The table shows a cumulative probability p = 96.71%. Assuming this is the cumulative probability up to the series' peak price, or some relevant cutoff price, its complement would be 1 − 96.71% = 3.29%. This type of calculation is crucial in Value at Risk (VaR), a key metric. If 96.71% of historical prices are below a specific threshold, the probability of the price exceeding that threshold is 3.29%. This is a tool for measuring the probability of extreme scenarios materializing (for example, if 94 is the final value, the probability of exceeding it is low).

The statistical diagnosis for NFLX is that of a high-risk, high-reward stock.

The historical return is excellent (12,268.42%), and the trend is upward, strong, and well-modeled by higher-order regressions. The positive bias suggests that historical surprises have tended to be on the upside.

On the other hand, the extreme volatility (standard deviation of 28.51) and high tail risk (positive kurtosis) imply that sudden and large drops are more likely than expected.

The 180-day forecast of 79.79 and the 360-day forecast of 85.49 suggest positive, but moderate, short-term performance, below the final price of 94 in your series. This could indicate that, according to the statistical model, the stock may be slightly overvalued or nearing a consolidation/correction phase after its historical rally.

From a statistical perspective, the forecasts suggest caution, as the projected future price is below the last recorded price (94), which would advise against immediate investment based solely on historical momentum.

From a risk management perspective, investing is only recommended if the investor has a high risk tolerance and is aware that NFLX's volatility and tail risk are significant (very high standard deviation and kurtosis).

Technical indicators are key tools for gauging market momentum and psychology, identifying whether a stock is overbought or oversold.

Moving averages smooth price action to identify the dominant trend. A complete consensus on moving averages (both simple and exponential, across different periods) indicating a sell signal is a very strong technical indication that the short-term and possibly medium-term trend has reversed, or that the current price is consistently below the shorter-period moving averages.

Technical analysis is triggering a red alert. The stock is overbought and under strong selling pressure according to momentum indicators, while the moving averages confirm an underlying trend bearish or an imminent correction. This contradicts the optimism that historically high performance might generate.

The investment decision should weigh the company's fundamental strength against short-term statistical/technical risk.

Given its current state, a cautious approach to decision-making is advisable. The statistical and technical analysis is a strong warning of a short-term correction.

Investing in NFLX at 94.79 is not recommended at this time. It is suggested to wait for a correction or a consolidation phase. A more attractive entry price would be around the statistical forecasts (79-85) or when the technical analysis reverses its overbought and sell signals.

I encourage my followers to become followers of this blog. If you have any comments, please share them; this helps me continuously improve these financial reports.