The first striking visual is the cumulative return of
784.80%. This represents exponential growth, with the asset rising from an
initial value of 37.97 to a closing value of 335.96.
This study includes three fitting models. The linear
model has a coefficient of determination of 80.14%, which is robust, but the
6th-order polynomial model reaches 92.38%. This indicates that Alphabet's price
does not follow a straight line, but rather exhibits acceleration and
correction cycles that the polynomial model captures more accurately,
suggesting a current phase of strong upward momentum.
The data show a clear deviation from normality
(Gaussian bell curve) and exhibit skewness; the value of 1.21 indicates
positive skewness. This means the "tail" of the distribution is
longer on the right. Financially, this is positive: there is a higher frequency
of days with low prices (accumulation) and less frequent but powerful events of
very high prices.
The fact that the current
price (335.96) is in the lowest frequency range (only 2 observations in the
upper interval) indicates that the stock is in a price discovery zone or near
all-time highs.
The Z-score of 4.03 for the
current price relative to the historical average is extremely high. This
statistically suggests that the current price is far from its historical
average of 101.42.
The forecasting models project
the following: the 90-day model yielded a value of 198.03, and the 360-day
model yielded 217.33. Observing these results, an interesting divergence is
found. While the current price is 335.96, short-term linear/polynomial forecasts
(198-217) place the value below the current closing price. This suggests that, statistically, the asset could be
"overbought" or in a short-term bubble relative to its historical
trend line.
The
current price (335.96) is well above the average (101.42) and the projected
forecasts (217.33). This indicates You could be buying at the peak of a
parabolic curve.
For a long-term investor, Alphabet demonstrates
undeniable statistical strength. However, for an entry at this precise moment,
the analysis suggests caution. The distance between the current price and the
moving average (Z=4.03) suggests waiting for a mean reversion or a technical
correction towards the 250-280 zone before taking a majority position.
The data of 12 buys and 0 sells on the moving
averages (MA) is compelling. This tells us that the market structure is solidly
bullish across all time horizons (short, medium, and long term).
The current price ($335.84) is above all moving
averages, especially the 200-day MA ($315.86). This indicates that the
"consensus value" has been consistently rising.
There are no signs of a structural trend reversal. The
algorithms would interpret any initial dip as a "buy the dip"
opportunity.
The ATR indicates lower volatility. At market tops,
this sometimes precedes a sharp move. The market is "too quiet,"
which is usually the prelude to a corrective move.
The probability and risk analysis is at the 100%
ceiling, meaning the cumulative probability p has reached 100% in the long
term. In statistical and technical terms, this suggests that the asset has
reached its maximum extension level relative to its historical average.
When an asset reaches its maximum expansion
probability, the Gaussian bell curve indicates that the next most likely move
is a return to the mean (in this case, targeting the $320-$325 range).
The price ($335.84) is very close to the yearly high
($340.49). The upside potential without a prior correction is only 1.3%, while
the risk of a drop to a solid support level is greater.
I fully agree with the diagnosis of uncertainty and
caution. Although the technical summary says "Buy," the discrepancy
between the moving averages and the oscillators suggests a market trap for late
entrants.
The risk/reward ratio is unfavorable near the 52-week
high, with a cumulative probability of 100%. If you already have positions, it
is vital to move them up to the Pivot Point ($334.93) or S1 ($334.42) level.
A break below the S2 support ($333.83) would confirm
that the selling oscillators were correct, initiating a correction toward the
50-week moving average.



No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario